Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25, getting a overall score of 79.3 against 74.3. The Galaxy Note 5 is a a little bit thinner and lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy A25. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A25, although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A25, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A25 features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Note 5 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A25, although it has a smaller aperture and a back-facing camera with a way worse 16 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.