Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than Galaxy A25, with an 88.3 score against 74.3. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 has older 11 version while Galaxy A25 has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy S10's construction is extremely lighter and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A25.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A25, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. The Galaxy A25 features a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A25 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.