Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A25's global score of 74.3. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A25.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A25 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit inferior pixel number per screen inch and a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy A25 features a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A25 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A25 and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with quite similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.