Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A25, getting a score of 80.1 against 74.3. Even being the best phone we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a way thicker and incredibly heavier phone than the Galaxy A25. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A25 has Android 14, giving lots of additional features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot better processing power than Galaxy A25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A25, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better screen density.
Galaxy A25 takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A25 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.