Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25, getting an 82.2 score against 74.3. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Mi 9T design is a little bit thicker but just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A25.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy A25 also counts with a way brighter screen and a little larger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A25. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25, although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. The Galaxy A25 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A25 counts with improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.