Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A25's 74.3 score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a just a little bit thicker and a little heavier phone than the Galaxy A25. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the previous 11 version while Galaxy A25 has Android 14.
The Galaxy A25 counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixels count in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25, although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, they both have the same aperture. The Galaxy A25 counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's battery performance is just as good as the Galaxy A25 one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 0% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.