Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is better than Galaxy A30's 79.6 global score. IPhone 12 Pro's design is newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy A30's, but it's also heavier. IPhone 12 Pro features a better performance than Galaxy A30, because although it has 2 less cores (although faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532px. The iPhone 12 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A30 counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a much better battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.