Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-03-02 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A30's 79.6 overall score. The iPhone 13 Pro design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A30, but it is somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more RAM memory.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A30 features better battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.