Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A30's score of 79.6. The Google Pixel construction is lighter than the Galaxy A30, although it's thicker and was released 2 years before. Google Pixel features a processor that's very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy A30, and although the Google Pixel has 4 lesser cpu cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM.
The Google Pixel has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A30 features a bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A30 counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a much lower resolution camera and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.