Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than Galaxy A30, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 79.6. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, we must tell that it's also a somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A30. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A30 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A30 has just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17% larger battery size. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega pixels and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.