Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30, with an 81.9 score against 79.6. Although Google Pixel 4 and the Samsung Galaxy A30 were released with only a couple months difference, the Google Pixel 4 body is a little lighter but also just a little thicker. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
Google Pixel 4 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A30 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A30 has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.