Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A30, getting an 87.5 score against 79.6. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A30, but it is a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A30 has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A30 counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.