Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2019-03-02 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has a global score of 79.6, which is slightly better than HTC U11's 77.6 general score. Galaxy A30 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than HTC U11. HTC U11 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30. They have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
HTC U11 has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher display density. HTC U11 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels camera, and they both have the same camera aperture, the HTC U11 also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a way better (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A30 features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A30 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.