Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy A30's global score of 79.6. Even though LG K92 is newer than the Galaxy A30, it is heavier and a little thicker. LG K92 features a screen that's just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy A30, because although the LG K92 has a little worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit larger screen.
The LG K92 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG K92 also has more RAM memory. The LG K92 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG K92 has a much better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot larger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
The LG K92 counts with a battery life that is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A30.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.