Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 has a general score of 79.6, which is just a bit better than the LG Q70's 77.9 global score. Although the Galaxy A30 is older than LG Q70, it's body is lighter and a little bit thinner. LG Q70 has a display that is very similar to the Galaxy A30 one, and although the LG Q70 has a just a little lower pixel density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2310 resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
LG Q70 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Q70 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM.
The LG Q70 and Samsung Galaxy A30 both have quite similar batteries duration. LG Q70 takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have a same size camera sensor, the LG Q70 also counts with a back camera with much more MP and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.