Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 is a bit better than LG V10, with a 79.6 score against 78.6. The Galaxy A30 is a newer device, and it is also lighter and somewhat thinner than LG V10. The Galaxy A30 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A30 also has a higher number of cores.
The LG V10 has a better looking screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixel density. LG V10 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a 16 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the LG V10 also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better video quality.
LG V10 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A30, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V10 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A30 has better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.