Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-03-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy A30, having a score of 81.3 against 79.6. Even when LG V35 ThinQ and Galaxy A30 were released only a few months apart, LG V35 ThinQ is a little lighter and just a bit thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A30, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A30 features superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. LG V35 ThinQ captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a 16 MP back-facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.