Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than Samsung Galaxy A30, getting a score of 91.2 against 79.6. The LG Wing construction is newer, but a lot thicker and way heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A30. LG Wing features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a little lower pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution.
LG Wing has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The LG Wing counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 and the LG Wing have really similar batteries duration. LG Wing shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.