Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is just a bit better than the Galaxy A30, getting an 80.9 score against 79.6. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's body is a lot newer than the Galaxy A30's, but it's a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a better screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A30 counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A30 features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality, a much higher video quality and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.