Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than Galaxy A30, with a general score of 81.9 against 79.6. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is newer than the Galaxy A30's, although it's just a little heavier and just a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A30 has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a slightly better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a quite higher pixels number per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A30, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures, a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.