Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A30's 79.6 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a notably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A30, but it is heavier and a bit thicker. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a little worse pixel quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A30 has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A30, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A30, because it has a way higher (4K) video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture, a much larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.