Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A30, with an 87.1 score against 79.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A30, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A30 counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy A30, because it has a larger aperture, a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.