Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 is a bit better than the Moto Z Force, having a 79.6 score against 75.8. Even though the Galaxy A30 is extremely newer than Moto Z Force, it is a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A30, although it has 4 less cores (although faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A30 has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.