Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-02 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a 79.6 score against 76.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A30 is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little sharper display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A30, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution back camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A30, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.