Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-02 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 79.6 against 77.4. The Galaxy A30 body is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's thicker and heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A30. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, a tinier aperture and a lot less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A30 has a much better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 47 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.