Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30, having a general score of 87 against 79.6. The Motorola razr (2020) body is newer than Samsung Galaxy A30's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A30 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a little higher number of pixels per screen inch, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit larger screen.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A30 has a much better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Motorola razr (2020) captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a camera with much more megapixels and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.