Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-03-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A30's 79.6 general score. The Galaxy A52 design is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy A30's, although it's a bit thicker and heavier. The Galaxy A52 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Galaxy A52 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy A52 counts with much more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.