Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A30's overall score of 79.6. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much newer than the Galaxy A30, it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little sharper display than Galaxy A30, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite larger display and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A52 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures, a much more megapixels back camera and a way better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A30, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A30, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.