Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 is slightly better than the Galaxy A70, having a general score of 79.6 against 76.9. The Samsung Galaxy A30 construction is a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the Galaxy A70, although both of them were released only a few months apart. Galaxy A30 and Galaxy A70 feature really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A70 has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A30 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have a F1.7 aperture, the same (Full HD) video resolution, the same video frame rates and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A70 features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.