Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than the Galaxy A30's 79.6 global score. Galaxy F62's body is newer, but thicker and notably heavier than Galaxy A30. The Galaxy F62 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A30, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen. Galaxy F62 features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 75% bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos, a way better (4K) video definition and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.