Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than Galaxy A30's 79.6 global score. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than the Galaxy A30, it is thicker and a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a greater pixel amount in each screen inch, a quite bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a way higher video quality and a way larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.