Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-02 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A30, with a overall score of 82.6 against 79.6. Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and much thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy A30. The Galaxy S25 has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A30 features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A30 and Galaxy S25 both count with quite similar battery durations. The Galaxy S25 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a lot better resolution back camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.