Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-02 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Galaxy A30, having a 90.7 score against 79.6. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and extremely lighter device than Galaxy A30. Galaxy A30 counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Galaxy A30, because it has a bit larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little higher display pixel density. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with a way higher 200 MP resolution and a way better video definition.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features superior battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.