Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy A30's global score of 79.6. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than Galaxy A30, although it's extremely heavier and noticeably thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A30. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Galaxy A30 has a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A30 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro's storage to store more apps and games is very similar to Galaxy A30's one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.