Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A30, having a general score of 81 against 79.6. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body is newer than Galaxy A30's, although it's incredibly heavier and much thicker. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A30. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. Galaxy XCover Pro takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a much smaller sensor which gives a way worse image and video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's storage for games and applications is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A30 one, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 1% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.