Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A30, getting a score of 88.5 against 79.6. The Galaxy Z Flip body is newer and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A30's, but it is also just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A30, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments and a lot worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger back camera sensor.
Galaxy A30 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.