Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A30, with a score of 92.3 against 79.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer and just a bit thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A30. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a just a little better amount of pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a way less MP resolution camera in the back and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.