Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A30's global score of 79.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is newer and a bit thinner, but also notably heavier than Galaxy A30. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger display and a better 1768 x 2208px resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and a lot less mega pixels back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a much bigger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.