Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| 2019-03-02 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has an overall score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZs's 77.2 general score. The Galaxy A30 construction is newer and a little bit thinner than the Xperia XZs's, although it's just a little bit heavier. Xperia XZs counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A30, although it has 4 lesser processing cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount.
The Sony Xperia XZs features just a bit better display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display. Sony Xperia XZs shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a camera with a better resolution and a larger back camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A30 features a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 38 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.