Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, with a 79.6 score against 78.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A30 is incredibly older than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's design is lighter and a little bit thinner. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A30, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a camera with a way higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.