Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blue and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has a general score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A30s's 79.8 general score. The Google Nexus 6 is an extremely older, noticeably thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than Galaxy A30s. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Nexus 6 has the older 5.1 version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version.
The Google Nexus 6 has a little better performance than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. The Google Nexus 6 has a lot better screen than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels count per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A30s features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A30s takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with superior battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.