Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30s, having a general score of 81.9 against 79.8. Although Google Pixel 4 and Samsung Galaxy A30s were only released with a few months difference, the Google Pixel 4 design is just a bit lighter but also a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixels quantity per inch in the display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
Galaxy A30s counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.