Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30s, with a score of 82.9 against 79.8. Google Pixel 4a's design is newer and lighter, but also a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A30s. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a much better display than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much greater count of pixels per screen inch. Google Pixel 4a features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a way worse 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition. Galaxy A30s has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A30s also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A30s features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.