Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is much better than the Galaxy A30s's general score of 79.8. Although the Google Pixel 5 is a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A30s, it's just a little bit lighter and also newer. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot higher screen pixels density. Google Pixel 5 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A30s features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A30s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 2 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.