Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30s is a little bit better than the HTC One M9, with a 79.8 score against 77.7. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A30s has newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. The Galaxy A30s is a incredibly newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the HTC One M9, but it's just a bit heavier.
The HTC One M9 has a greater hardware performance than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits processing unit. The HTC One M9 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much greater pixel density.
The Galaxy A30s has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. HTC One M9 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a camera with a worse 20 MP resolution and a much tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.