Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30s is slightly better than LG G7 Fit, with a 79.8 score against 77. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A30s has the previous 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy A30s's design is newer and just a little thinner, but just a bit heavier than LG G7 Fit.
LG G7 Fit and Galaxy A30s both count with very similar processing units, and although the LG G7 Fit has 4 lesser processing cores (although faster), they both have the same RAM amount. LG G7 Fit features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the display and a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG G7 Fit shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a way lower 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A30s counts with better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.