Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A30s's 79.8 global score. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than Galaxy A30s, but it's just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixels count per inch of display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a way less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light images and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy A30s has superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.