Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A30s, getting an 87.1 score against 79.8. Even though the LG Velvet is a better device than Samsung Galaxy A30s, we must highlight that it's also a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. LG Velvet has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, a better display pixels density and a bit bigger screen.
LG Velvet features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory. The LG Velvet features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 4000mAh. The LG Velvet shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.