Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a score of 80.9, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A30s's overall score of 79.8. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11, providing a lot of extra features. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra construction is much newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A30s.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a bit larger display, a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better pixel count in each inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A30s features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher video definition. Galaxy A30s features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A30s also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has superior battery duration than Galaxy A30s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.