Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A30s's overall score of 79.8. These phones include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11, providing the user a lot of extra features. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a way newer device than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, but it's heavier and thicker.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bit bigger display and a better pixels quantity per display inch. Galaxy A30s counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. Galaxy A30s has just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.